But, in addition to converting a file to the correct format, you will also need to create a video of the proper size. In a previous posting, I wrote about the video format to use for digital publishing-H.264-encoded video files. InDesign has had the ability to place video files since CS2, but its video capabilities were greatly enhanced in InDesign CS5 and 5.5. Thank you for all the replies, guys.These days more of us are using InDesign to create non-print projects-interactive PDF, SWF, EPUB, and applications for tablets. I was told to use Handbrake in lieu of AME, so is there a way to render the video through that programme that will produce a similar result to AME? I followed someone's instructions for encoding videos through Handbrake, but the quality looked exactly the same as when exported from AE. I've changed the preset when I was fiddling with the settings, and it didn't effect the quality at all, although I'll try that specific preset tomorrow. The videos I produced in college were all fine quality, although most of them were incorporating Photoshop files, so I wonder if that has anything to do with it. I don't really know), and I've just stuck with it ever since, out of sheer ignorance, I guess. My tutor in college told us to use PAL D1/DV Widescreen Square Pixel for our first motion graphics project (perhaps it was to do with producing small file sizes. It won't run on my computer for whatever reason. I have exhausted all solutions, so if anyone knows how to fix this problem, without using Media Encoder (as it won't run on my laptop) it would be much appreciated! Looking at them side by side, there doesn't seem much difference, so perhaps it's just because AE displays it on a smaller screen in the timeline, so it's not as noticeable that the quality is poor, but there is definitely a significant difference between their quality when I view it before and after it is rendered. I've attached images as an example, comparing the video as it appears in AE versus how it looks when it's rendered. I've seen people recommending choosing, 'h.254' as the preset (although this isn't an option for me, even after I scoured my preferences as one comment I saw directed) or using Adobe Media Encoder, which won't run on my computer (which is a Mac OS X). I've messed around with some other codecs and settings, but I'm not very knowledgable in this area, and the ones I've tried (namely 'animation') haven't made any difference, except making Quicktime player unable to open the file. It's definitely not a case of me rendering it at a lower resolution, as both the preview and 'best' settings are set to as high a resolution as possible. I thought it might have something to do with using Illustrator files to animate, and I tried converting them to shapes, but most of my drawings seem to be too complex to be properly converted to shapes. This has generally worked fine for me, but the last two videos I produced for work have been rendered in poor quality. I'm rendering it the way my college tutor told me: Quicktime–>h.264–>Spatial Quality 80. The video is made primarily with Illustrator files and text created in AE. I'm making an explainer video for the company I work for, but when I render it, it turns out quite blurry looking and low quality, despite being crisp in the AE's timeline. I've been having this problem for a while now, but it's beginning to bother me now that I'm using After Effects in a professional capacity. I know this question has been asked a bunch of times on the Adobe forums, but I can't seem to find a solution.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |